admin

[Civil Appeal No. 5954 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 33200 of 2014] Dipak Misra Leave granted. In this appeal by special leave the plaintiff-appellant has called in question the legal sustainability of the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in OSA No. 229 […]

[Criminal Appeal Nos.410-411 of 2012] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 1. These appeals are directed against the common impugned judgment dated 24th March, 2011 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at Jabalpur, by which High Court upheld the judgment of conviction and sentence for the offences u/s 302, 307, 394, 397 and

[Criminal Appeal No. 1308 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.9412 of 2013] O R D E R (SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. In this special leave petition, judgment and order dated 15/10/2004 passed by the Madras High Court in Criminal Appeal No.963 of 2001 is under challenge.

[Criminal Appeal No.1307 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.8395 of 2012] (SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. In this appeal order dated 11/5/2012 passed by the High Court of Calcutta is under challenge. By the impugned order the High Court reversed the trial court’s order which had rejected

[Criminal Appeal No. 1278 of 2014 @ Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.1696 of 2006] Chandramauli Kr. Prasad State of Punjab aggrieved by the order dated 7th of September, 2005, passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Criminal Revision No. 320 of 2000 whereby it has set aside the order of the trial court

[Criminal Appeal No. 1277 of 2014 @Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.9127 of 2013] Chandramauli Kr. Prasad The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter called as IPC) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The maximum sentence provided under Section 498-A IPC is

[Criminal Appeal No.1251 of 2006] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 16th June, 2006 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in Criminal Appeal No.9/2000. By the impugned judgment the High Court partly allowed the appeal preferred by the State of Karnataka, set aside the judgment of acquittal

[Civil Appeal No. 5927 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.7704 of 2008] VIKRAMAJIT SEN,J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This Appeal assails the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta which had allowed the Appeal preferred against the judgment of the learned Single Judge, who in turn had applied and

[Civil Appeal No.4712 of 2007] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 26th June, 2007, delivered in A.P.D. No.614 of 2005 by the High Court of Calcutta, this appeal has been filed against the concurrent findings arrived at by the High Court in the aforestated appeal. 2. Facts which

[Criminal Appeal No. 1300 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL) No. 2447 of 2013] N.V. RAMANA. J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises out of order dated 6th November, 2012 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad refusing the prayer of the appellant for quashing the proceedings in Complaint Case