NEW DELHI: The third anniversary of Delhi high court blast saw a low-key prayer ceremony with kin of victims gathering at gate number 5. Sunday’s remembrance was in contrast to earlier occasions when in 2012, on the first anniversary, judges led by the then Chief Justice and several lawyers paid tributes to victims of the […]
3 years after Delhi HC blasts, security is still an issue Read More »
The Supreme Court on Monday said that averments against CBI director Ranjit Sinha regarding the visitors’ logbook at his Delhi residence are “very serious” and asked him to reply within a week. A bench led by Justice H L Dattu rejected Sinha’s argument that filing an affidavit would mean disclosing crucial facts relating to 2G
SC asks CBI chief Ranjit Sinha to reply on visitors’ logbook at his residence Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 1521 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal Nos. 1526-1527 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 1519 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 1528 of 2013] A.K. SIKRI, J. Six persons were accused of conspiring with each other and committing murder of one Ramesh Masta with common intention. FIR No. 414 dated November 06, 2004 was registered
Recent SC Judgement – State of Haryana Vs. Satender – 23.05.14 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 1118 of 2014] A.K. SIKRI, J. The two appellants herein are aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court pronounced on July 27, 2011, whereby their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘IPC’), as recorded by the Magistrate, has been upheld and
Recent SC Judgement – Sudarshan Vs. State of Maharashtra – 23.05.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos. 5589-5605 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos. 5606-5608 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos. 5609-5611 of 2014] [Civil Appeal No. 5612 of 2014] [Civil Appeal No. 5613 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos. 5614-5621 of 2014] [Civil Appeal No. 5622 of 2014] [Civil Appeal No. 5623 of 2014] [Civil Appeal No. 5624 of 2014] A.K.
Recent SC Judgement – Joginder Pal Vs. State of Punjab – 23.05.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.6717 of 2008] Dipak Misra, J. 1. Calling in question the legal defensibility of the judgment and order dated 19.01.2007 passed by the High Court of Delhi in W.P.(C)No.16104 of 2004 whereby it has annulled the judgment and order dated 28.06.2004 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (for short
Recent SC Judgement – Union of India Vs. R.P. Singh – 22.05.14 Read More »
NEW DELHI: Muslim prisoners are likely to be the biggest beneficiaries of the government’s decision to facilitate release of undertrials languishing in jails for long. This is because the rate of undertrial Muslim incarceration is almost twice that of Hindus. Calculated on the number of undertrials per lakh population (of people adhering to that particular
SC order to release undertrials will come to aid of Muslim prisoners Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday sought responses from the Centre and state governments on a PIL seeking to free pavements and roads from encroachment to provide citizens their right to free passage and free flow of traffic on roads. A bench of Chief Justice R M Lodha and Justices Kurian Joseph and R
SC to govt: When will pavements and roads be encroachment free? Read More »
ITEM NO.1C COURT NO.2 SECTION II SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Md. Jamiluddin Nasir Vs. State of West Bengal [Criminal Appeal No(S). 1240-1241 of 2010] Aftab Ahmed Ansari @Aftab Ansari Vs. State of West Bengal [Criminal Appeal Nos. 1242-1243 of 2010] Date: 21/05/2014 These Appeals were called on for pronouncement of judgment today.
Recent SC Judgement – Md. Jamiluddin Nasir Vs. State of West Bengal- 21.05.14 Read More »
NEW DELHI: The man whose PIL led the Supreme Court to lay down a fixed tenure for the CBI director now wants a review of the rule in the light of a raging controversy surrounding Ranjit Sinha, the incumbent chief of the premier investigation agency. Journalist-turned-activist Vineet Narain has urged the Supreme Court to send
Crusader scribe urges SC to ask CBI director to go on leave Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
