Law Intellect India

admin

Stressed-out students attempting suicide

Bangalore: Growing up is fraught with suicidal tendencies. A Nimhans study under way has found that 11% of college students and 7%-8% of high school students have attempted suicide. In the survey, 1,500 school and college students were studied on suicide prevention. “What’s bothering the current adolescent generation is stress due to academics, relationship with […]

Stressed-out students attempting suicide Read More »

CBI director gets second SC notice on ‘undesired’ visitors

  NEW DELHI: After seeking CBI director Ranjit Sinha’s explanation on Monday over “undesired” visitors to his residence relating to 2G spectrum scam case, the Supreme Court on Tuesday asked him to respond in 10 days to identical allegations concerning the coal block allocation scam. A bench of Chief Justice R M Lodha and Justices

CBI director gets second SC notice on ‘undesired’ visitors Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Bal Kishan Giri Vs. State of U.P. – 28.05.14

[Criminal Appeal No. 555 of 2010] Dr. B.S. Chauhan,J. 1. In this appeal, impugned judgment and order dated 5.2.2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Contempt Application (Crl.) No. 15 of 2009, by which the appellant stood convicted for committing criminal contempt under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

Recent SC Judgement – Bal Kishan Giri Vs. State of U.P. – 28.05.14 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Mahavir Singh Vs. State of Haryana – 23.05.14

[Criminal Appeal No. 2231 of 2010] Dr. B.S. Chauhan,J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 20.1.2010, passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal appeal No.499-DB of 2001, affirming the judgment and order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat dated 4.9.2001/7.9.2001, passed

Recent SC Judgement – Mahavir Singh Vs. State of Haryana – 23.05.14 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Paulmeli Vs. State of Tamil Nadu through Inspector of Police – 23.05.14

[Criminal Appeal No.1636 of 2011] Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 6.10.2009, passed by the High Court of Tamil Nadu (Madurai Bench) in Criminal Appeal (MD) No.540 of 2008 affirming the judgment and order dated 18.11.2008, passed in Sessions Case No.18 of 2001 by

Recent SC Judgement – Paulmeli Vs. State of Tamil Nadu through Inspector of Police – 23.05.14 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Krishan Kumar Vs. State of Haryana – 23.05.14

[Criminal Appeal No. 1563 of 2010] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. That the present statutory appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 23.3.2010 whereby the High Court has convicted the appellant by reversing the judgment of the Trial Court, which had acquitted the appellant of the charges under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and

Recent SC Judgement – Krishan Kumar Vs. State of Haryana – 23.05.14 Read More »

Lives at risk with 10,000 illegal bottled water units in Delhi

NEW DELHI: More than 10,000 illegal packaged water bottling units are operating in the National Capital Territory, often using the labels of the 64 licensed manufacturers, putting the health of millions of people at risk, officials maintain. “It may sound horrific but only 64 water bottling plants have the licence to supply packed drinking water

Lives at risk with 10,000 illegal bottled water units in Delhi Read More »

Disclaimer

In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.

The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.

Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.