admin

[Civil Appeal Nos.5899-5900 of 2014 arising out of SLP (c) Nos.16958-59 of 2013] ANIL R. DAVE, J. Leave granted. As facts of both the appeals are similar, at the request of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, both the appeals had been heard together. Being aggrieved by the judgments delivered by the High Court […]

[Civil Appeal Nos. of 2014 @ out of SLP (C) Nos.36299-36303/2010] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 16th July, 2005 passed by the High Court of Uttaranchal (now Uttarakhand) at Nainital in first Appeal No. 56 of 2001 (Old No.325/1995). By the impugned

[Civil Appeal No. of 2014 arising out of SLP @ No.24083 of 2013] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 15th March, 2013 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad in Writ Petition No.1047 of

[Criminal Appeal No. 512 of 2010] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 31st March, 2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Criminal Appeal No.1009 of 2005. By the impugned judgment the High Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the judgment of conviction and sentence

[Criminal Appeal No.1188 of 2009] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 26th March, 2007 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No.529-SB of 1994. By the impugned judgment the High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction and sentence of

[Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Criminal Appeal Nos. 2277-2278 of 2009] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. These appeals are directed against the common judgment dated 8th January, 2008 passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in Death Reference Case No.2 of 2007 and J. Crl. A.No.12 of 2007. By the impugned judgment, the High Court

[Criminal Appeal No. 593 of 2010] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 27th April, 2009, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Criminal Appeal No.441 of 2007. By the impugned judgment appeal preferred by the appellants- accused nos.1 to 3 has been dismissed and conviction of

[Criminal Appeal Nos.967-968 of 2010] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA,J 1. These appeals are directed against the common judgment dated 16th February, 2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No.1942 of 2009 and Reference No.5 of 2009. By the impugned common judgment, the High Court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the

[Civil Appeal Nos. of 2014 arising out of SLP(C) Nos.14947-14948 of 2011] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are directed against order dated 19.07.2010 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Arbitration Request No.39 of 2009. By the impugned order, the appellant’s prayer under Section 11 (6) of

[Criminal Appeal No. 1272 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL) No. 9353 of 2013] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant had been convicted under Section 307 IPC by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.28/2000 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years alongwith