admin

ITEM NO.1A COURT NO.2 SECTION IV [FOR JUDGMENT] SUPREME COURT OF INDIA B.S. Sandhu Vs. Government of India & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 4684-4685 of 2005] Dashmesh Educational Society Vs. Punjab Urban Development Authority & Ors.] [Civil Appeal No. 4799-4800 of 2005] SURESH SHARMA & ORS. Vs. B.S. SANDHU & ORS. [Civil Appeal NO. 4798 […]

[Civil Appeal Nos. 7201-7202 of 2008] Dipak Misra, 1. The respondent while holding the post of District Manager in the Food Corporation of India (for short the FCI) was proceeded against in a disciplinary proceedings as contemplated under Regulation 60 of the Food Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1971 (for brevity “the Regulations”) on the

[Criminal Appeal No. 147 of 2009] Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 24.5.2007 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No. 2681 of 1982, by which the High Court has affirmed the judgment and order passed by the IInd Additional

[Civil Appeal No.2273 of 2011] Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and decree dated 1.12.2009 in Regular Second Appeal No.2299 of 2009, passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh, affirming the judgment and decree dated 16.9.2008, passed by the Additional District Judge, Amritsar

[Criminal Appeal No. 45 of 2011] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. These appeals are filed by the convicted accused appellants as they are aggrieved by the conviction and sentences awarded to them by the Special Court (POTA), and confirmed by the High Court of Gujarat for the offences punishable under the provisions of the Indian

[Criminal Appeal No. 1342 of 2012] N.V. RAMANA, J. 1. This appeal arises out of Judgment and order dated 3 rd March, 2011 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana upholding the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad convicting the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 506, IPC. 2.

[Civil Original Jurisdiction Writ Petition (C) No.429 of 2014] DIPAK MISRA, J. 1. The petitioner, a practising advocate of this Court, as pro bone publico has preferred this writ petition with Article 32 of the Constitution with the following prayers: a. “Issue a writ of mandamus in public interest or any other appropriate writ, order,