[Civil Appeal Nos.3177-3178 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.26770-26771 of 2011] [Civil Appeal Nos.3179-3180 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.26779-26780 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No.3181 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.13124 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No.3182 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.17407 of 2012] A.K. SIKRI, J. […]
Recent SC Judgement – Mohan Singh Gill Vs. State of Punjab – 25.03.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos.4684-4685 of 2005] [Special Leave Petition (C) No.19226 of 2013] [Special Leave Petition (C) No.20235 of 2013] Judgment RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. The plaintiff in civil Suit No.65 of 2001 i.e. Dashmesh Education Society has preferred these appeals against the common order dated 12.10.2004 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana
NEW DELHI: Greenpeace India – the NGO whose seven bank accounts were frozen by the government for alleged violation of foreign currency rules – on Friday submitted its reply to home ministry’s month-old ‘show cause’ notice and rebutted all the charges made against it. The group, in its response, also accused the ministry for imposing
Greenpeace India says it is considering taking fight with govt to court Read More »
Describing them as a “menace to the society,” the Supreme Court on Friday sentenced to death a cab driver and his male friend for “brutally” raping and murdering an “innocent and helpless” BPO employee in Pune in 2007. Jyoti Chowdhari, 22, was traveling in her company’s pick-up cab on November 1, 2007, when the driver
NEW DELHI: Sahara chief Subrata Roy, behind bars for the last 14 months, may get out of jail next week as he told the Supreme Court on Friday that he had managed to raise sufficient cash and bank guarantee of Rs 5,000 crore to fulfill the bail condition. The court had directed Roy on March
Sahara chief Subrata Roy to SC: Mopped up funds for bail Read More »
PATERSON, NEW JERSEY: A paternity case involving a set of twins had a surprise ending worthy of a daytime TV talk show: The girls have different dads. A judge ruled Monday in a paternity case that the man from whom the twins’ mother sought child support has to pay for only one of the children.
Twins have different fathers, judge finds in paternity case Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.10091 of 2010] PVR Ltd. Vs. The Films Division & Ors. [Civil Appeal No.10092 of 2010] Union of India Vs. PVR Ltd. & Ors. [Civil Appeal No.10093 of 2010] Judgment RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. The appellant – PVR Limited – in Civil Appeal Nos. 10091 of 2010 and 10092 of 2010 is engaged
Recent SC Judgement – PVR Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka – 25.03.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 1049 of 2008] A. K. SIKRI, J. The appellant herein, which is the successor of M/s.Wockhardt Hospital and Heart Institute (referred to as the ‘Institute’ hereinafter) had a hospital at Bangalore. Sometime in the year 1990, the said Institute imported a Cardiac Catherization Laboratory (known as Angiography system) with its spares/accessories valued
[Writ Petition (Criminal) No.167 of 2012] [Writ Petition (Civil) No.21 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Civil) No.23 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 97 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Criminal) No.199 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 217 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Criminal) No.222 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Criminal) No.225 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Civil) No.758 of
Recent SC Judgement – Shreya Singhal Vs. Union of India – 24.03.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos. of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 34795-34796 of 2014] Prafulla C. Pant, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals arise out of judgment and order dated 6.3.2013, passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in CWP No. 7879 of 2012-H whereby the High Court has disposed of
Recent SC Judgement – State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Punra Devi – 24.03.15 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
