Law Intellect India

admin

Recent SC Judgement – Panna Lal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh. – 23.03.15

[Criminal Appeal No.1453 of 2009] Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. This appeal arises out of judgment and order dated 10.05.2007 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore, in Criminal Appeal No.1256 of 1997, affirming the judgment and order dated 11.12.1997 of the learned Additional District Judge, Sardarpur, District Dhar in Sessions […]

Recent SC Judgement – Panna Lal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh. – 23.03.15 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Rakesh Mishra. – 23.03.15

[Criminal Appeal No. 498 of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.5279 of 2007] State Of Madhya Pradesh Vs.Gyanendra Singh Jadon [Criminal Appeal No. 499 of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.5828 of 2007] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. Leave granted in both the matters. 2. These appeals arise out of the judgment and

Recent SC Judgement – State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Rakesh Mishra. – 23.03.15 Read More »

Salman Khan hit-and-run case: For victims, compensation matters more than conviction

“Compensation matters more than conviction,” say the victims of the 2002 hit-and-run case in which Bollywood star Salman Khan has been sentenced to five years in jail. Abdullah Rauf Shaikh, who lost a leg in the accident, said, “Nobody came to visit me in the last 13 years. I am forced to do petty jobs

Salman Khan hit-and-run case: For victims, compensation matters more than conviction Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – M/s. Millenium Wires Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. – 23.03.15

[Civil Appeal No. 3103 Of 2015 Arising out of SLP (C) No.9689 of 2014] The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Millenium Wires (P) Ltd. and Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 3104 of 2015 Arising out of SLP (C) No.11848 of 2014] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. Leave granted in both the matters. These appeals, by

Recent SC Judgement – M/s. Millenium Wires Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. – 23.03.15 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Avas Ayukt, U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Vs. Bhagwan Tiwari – 20.03.15

[Civil Appeal No.3134 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.35541 of 2010] Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel. The question involved in the appeal is with regard to the allotment of Flat No.3C-24, Pandeypur Yojana, Varanasi (U.P.), to the respondent under the Residential Housing Scheme, namely, Pandeypur Yojana in Varanasi. Looking at the peculiar

Recent SC Judgement – Avas Ayukt, U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Vs. Bhagwan Tiwari – 20.03.15 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Anirudh Kumar Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi – 20.03.15

[Civil Appeal No. 8284 of 2013] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. This appeal by special leave arises out of the impugned judgment and order dated 16.01.2012 passed by the High Court of Delhi in LPA No. 857 of 2010 in and by which, the High Court, while dismissing the appeal held that this matter does not

Recent SC Judgement – Anirudh Kumar Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi – 20.03.15 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Mrs. Priyanka Srivastava Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh – 19.03.15

[Criminal Appeal No.781 of 2012] Dipak Misra, J. 1. The present appeal projects and frescoes a scenario which is not only disturbing but also has the potentiality to create a stir compelling one to ponder in a perturbed state how some unscrupulous, unprincipled and deviant litigants can ingeniously and innovatively design in a nonchalant manner

Recent SC Judgement – Mrs. Priyanka Srivastava Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh – 19.03.15 Read More »

Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi seeks exemption from court appearance

LeT operations commander Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi, the mastermind of 2008 Mumbai terror attack, has pleaded before an Anti-Terrorism Court to exempt him from appearing in the court, citing alleged security threat. Advocate Raja Rizwan Abbasi, counsel for Lakhvi, filed the application in the ATC Islamabad on Monday requesting it to exempt his client from appearing

Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi seeks exemption from court appearance Read More »

Disclaimer

In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.

The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.

Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.