admin

[Civil Appeal No. 1049 of 2008] A. K. SIKRI, J. The appellant herein, which is the successor of M/s.Wockhardt Hospital and Heart Institute (referred to as the ‘Institute’ hereinafter) had a hospital at Bangalore. Sometime in the year 1990, the said Institute imported a Cardiac Catherization Laboratory (known as Angiography system) with its spares/accessories valued […]

[Writ Petition (Criminal) No.167 of 2012] [Writ Petition (Civil) No.21 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Civil) No.23 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 97 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Criminal) No.199 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 217 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Criminal) No.222 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Criminal) No.225 of 2013] [Writ Petition (Civil) No.758 of

[Civil Appeal Nos. of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 34795-34796 of 2014] Prafulla C. Pant, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals arise out of judgment and order dated 6.3.2013, passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in CWP No. 7879 of 2012-H whereby the High Court has disposed of

[Civil Appeal No. 3050 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 17859 of 2014] Prafulla C. Pant, J. 1. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 30.5.2011, passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior Bench, in Second Appeal No. 256 of 2005 whereby said court allowed the second appeal and

[Civil Appeal No. 3124 of 2015 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.9305/2011] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises out of the order dated 15.07.2010 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi, dismissing the Letters Patent Appeal No.466 of 2010, holding that respondent is entitled to be taken

[Criminal Appeal No…505…/2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL) No. 1873/2011] Amitava Roy,J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The instant appeal launches a challenge to the conviction of the appellant herein under section 396 of the Indian Penal Code (for short hereinafter referred to as the “Code”) for committing dacoity as well as murder of

[Civil Appeal Nos.9133-9134 of 2003] [Civil Appeal No.9135 of 2003] R.F.Nariman, J. 1. The question which arises for consideration in the present appeals is the constitutional validity of the retrospective amendment to Section 143(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Both the Single Judge and the Division Bench of the Gauhati High Court have held

[Criminal Appeal No.1265 of 2009] Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. This appeal challenges the judgment and final order dated 09.05.2008 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No.559-DB of 2000 affirming the judgment of conviction recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonepat, in Sessions Case No.54 of