THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: The vigilance and anti-corruption bureau (VACB) will interrogate finance minister KM Mani in connection with the bar bribery case that is being probed by the agency. The investigating arm of the agency, the special investigation unit-I, has conveyed the decision to the minister and has sought a convenient time for the procedure. Even though […]
Vigilance seeks time to interrogate Mani Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos. 3105-3106 of 2015 @ Special Leave Petition (C) Nos.31194-31195 of 2010] Uday Umesh Lalit J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals challenge the order dated 14.1.2010 in CMM No.846 of 2008 and order dated 2.6.2010 in Review Petition No.58 of 2010 arising out of the said order dated 14.1.2010 in CMM No.846
Recent SC Judgement – Ramesh Vs. Harbans Nagpal – 23.03.15 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.782 of 2011] Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. This appeal seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 16.12.2010 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior in Criminal Appeal No. 58 of 2006 dismissing the appeal and affirming the judgment of conviction recorded by the Special Judge (Prevention of
Recent SC Judgement – Kedari Lal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh – 23.03.15 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.1453 of 2009] Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. This appeal arises out of judgment and order dated 10.05.2007 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore, in Criminal Appeal No.1256 of 1997, affirming the judgment and order dated 11.12.1997 of the learned Additional District Judge, Sardarpur, District Dhar in Sessions
Recent SC Judgement – Panna Lal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh. – 23.03.15 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 498 of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.5279 of 2007] State Of Madhya Pradesh Vs.Gyanendra Singh Jadon [Criminal Appeal No. 499 of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.5828 of 2007] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. Leave granted in both the matters. 2. These appeals arise out of the judgment and
Recent SC Judgement – State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Rakesh Mishra. – 23.03.15 Read More »
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday declined to give interim protection from arrest to AAP MLA Jarnail Singh, who is accused of participating in preventing an MCD engineer from demolishing an unauthorised building, causing damage to state property and beating up the engineer. The court of Justice Sunita Gupta has issued notice to the police
Court refuses to shield MLA Jarnail Singh from arrest Read More »
“Compensation matters more than conviction,” say the victims of the 2002 hit-and-run case in which Bollywood star Salman Khan has been sentenced to five years in jail. Abdullah Rauf Shaikh, who lost a leg in the accident, said, “Nobody came to visit me in the last 13 years. I am forced to do petty jobs
Salman Khan hit-and-run case: For victims, compensation matters more than conviction Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 3103 Of 2015 Arising out of SLP (C) No.9689 of 2014] The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Millenium Wires (P) Ltd. and Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 3104 of 2015 Arising out of SLP (C) No.11848 of 2014] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. Leave granted in both the matters. These appeals, by
[Civil Appeal No.3134 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.35541 of 2010] Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel. The question involved in the appeal is with regard to the allotment of Flat No.3C-24, Pandeypur Yojana, Varanasi (U.P.), to the respondent under the Residential Housing Scheme, namely, Pandeypur Yojana in Varanasi. Looking at the peculiar
[Civil Appeal No. 8284 of 2013] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. This appeal by special leave arises out of the impugned judgment and order dated 16.01.2012 passed by the High Court of Delhi in LPA No. 857 of 2010 in and by which, the High Court, while dismissing the appeal held that this matter does not
Recent SC Judgement – Anirudh Kumar Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi – 20.03.15 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
