Law Intellect India

admin

Recent SC Judgement – Union of India Vs. Major General Shri Kant Sharma – 11.03.15

[Civil Appeal No. 7400 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.7338 of 2013] [Civil Appeal Nos.7375-7376 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.7399 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.9388 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.9389 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.96 of 2014] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J In these appeals the question raised is whether the right of appeal under Section 30 […]

Recent SC Judgement – Union of India Vs. Major General Shri Kant Sharma – 11.03.15 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Kalyani Mathivanan Vs. K.V. Jeyaraj – 11.03.15

[Civil Appeal Nos.5946-5947 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos.6455-6456 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos.8602-8603 of 2014] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA,J 1. These appeals have been preferred by the appellants against a common judgment and order dated 26th June, 2014 passed by the Division Bench of the Madras High Court, Madurai Bench in Writ Petition (MD) No.11350 of

Recent SC Judgement – Kalyani Mathivanan Vs. K.V. Jeyaraj – 11.03.15 Read More »

Delhi HC denies travel abroad permission, Pachauri withdraws plea

TERI Director General R K Pachauri, facing allegations of sexually harassing a woman employee, was on Thursday denied permission to travel abroad for next week’s Global Water Summit in Greece by Delhi High Court after which he withdrew his plea. Justice S P Garg disagreed with the request of Pachauri, that he should be allowed

Delhi HC denies travel abroad permission, Pachauri withdraws plea Read More »

To keep eye on cops, SC wants CCTV cameras at police stations

The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed the Delhi Police to install CCTV cameras in all police stations in the national capital in two months. Concerned over the behaviour of policemen towards complainants, especially women, a bench of Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice S A Bobde said that the Delhi Police Commissioner will ensure

To keep eye on cops, SC wants CCTV cameras at police stations Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Pawan Kumar @ Monu Mittal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh – 11.03.15

[Criminal Appeal No. 2194 of 2011] Rakesh Anand and ANR. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & ANR. [Criminal Appeal Nos. 2195-2196 of 2011] Shiv Kesh Giri @ Lalla Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [Criminal Appeal No. 2198 of 2011] Devesh Agnihotri Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [Criminal Appeal No. 2199/2011] Rajesh Verma Vs. State of

Recent SC Judgement – Pawan Kumar @ Monu Mittal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh – 11.03.15 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – St. Mary’s Hotel Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kottayam District Coop. Bank Ltd. – 10.03.15

[Writ Petition (C) No.367 of 2011] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. At the time of hearing of this petition, it has been submitted that Petitioner No.1 has already filed an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai (DRAT) and the said appeal, being AIR (SA) 230/2011, is pending. In the afore-stated appeal an

Recent SC Judgement – St. Mary’s Hotel Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kottayam District Coop. Bank Ltd. – 10.03.15 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Mohammed Hussain Warekar Vs. Union of India – 10.03.15

[Writ Petition (C) No. 37 of 2013] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that two appeals which have been filed by the petitioner, being CCI/568/1988 and CCI/569/1988, are pending before the First Cooperative Court at Mumbai. 2. We direct the said Court to dispose of

Recent SC Judgement – Mohammed Hussain Warekar Vs. Union of India – 10.03.15 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – V. Krishnaswamy Vs. Karnataka Rajya Kaigarika Sahakari Bank Niyamita – 10.03.15

[Civil Appeal Nos. 2874-75 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.18732-18733 of 2012] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants that the dispute with regard to the amount payable by the appellants is pending before the Joint Registrar of the Cooperative Societies

Recent SC Judgement – V. Krishnaswamy Vs. Karnataka Rajya Kaigarika Sahakari Bank Niyamita – 10.03.15 Read More »

Disclaimer

In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.

The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.

Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.