MUMBAI: After having renamed Bombay as Mumbai during its rule in Maharashtra in the 90s, Shiv Sena, which is an ally of BJP in the state and the Centre, is now vehemently pressing for its demand to rename the HC and IIT-B. Sena MP Arvind Sawant said he had taken up the matter with Union […]
Britons coined Bombay; IIT and HC must be renamed: Sena Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 2822 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.21260 of 2011] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Upon hearing the learned counsel, we have learnt that the appellant has already filed an appeal before the Debts Recovery Tribunal at Ahmedabad (DRT), being Securitisation Appeal No.38 of 2001, which is pending.
[Criminal Appeal No.65 of 2012] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. This criminal appeal is filed by the accused against the final order/judgment dated 15.03.2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No.2109-SB of 2009 which arises out of judgment/order dated 18.08.2009/20.08.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat
Recent SC Judgement – Deepak Vs. State of Haryana – 10.03.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 5099 of 2008] [Civil Appeal No. 5126 of 2008] VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. These Appeals were originally filed seeking relief on the basis of provisions in the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Subsequently, upon the enactment of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, the
Recent SC Judgement – Bhargava & Associates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India – 10.03.15 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.787 of 2011] [Criminal Appeal No.788 of 2011] VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. These two Appeals before us assail the common Judgment dated 8.9.2010 of the Madras High Court which only partly allowed the Appeals before it, in favour of the Accused-Appellants. The Appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 787/ 2011 is the First Accused;
After having renamed Bombay as Mumbai during its rule in Maharashtra between 1995-99, Shiv Sena, which is sharing power with BJP in both state and the Centre, is now vehemently pressing for its demand to rename the Bombay High Court. The saffron party wants the name Bombay dropped and replaced it with Mumbai. Talking to
Shiv Sena now wants renaming of Bombay High Court Read More »
A sessions court will pronounce the judgment in the 2002 alleged hit and run case involving actor Salman Khan on may 6 Judge D W Deshpande announced the date before a packed court room today. The announcement follows the culmination of a trial that commenced in April last year. Khan will have to be present
Salman Khan hit-and-run case: Verdict to be announced on May 6 Read More »
MUMBAI: The Maharashtra government on Monday claimed that it brought in the beef ban law to protect the cow and its progeny due to their many benefits — from milk to the use of dung and urine in making pest repellents and medicinal products. In an affidavit filed before Bombay high court by Chitrakala Suryawanshi,
Maharashtra to HC: Beef ban does not violate Constitutional rights Read More »
The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it would first decide the “vital” question as to the composition of the Constitution Bench that should hear the challenge to the validity of the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC). A bench led by Justice JS Khehar decided to first hear the arguments regarding the judges who should hear
SC to first decide on composition of bench that should hear NJAC case Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 1311 of 2006] VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. This Appeal by Special Leave is directed against the Judgment of the High Court of Madras dated 5.10.2005 whereby the conviction of the Accused/ Appellant Nagaraj under Section 302 IPC came to be affirmed. The Accused was sentenced to Life Imprisonment and was further directed
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
