A day after the Gujarat High Court told a gangrape victim to “bravely go ahead with her pregnancy and deliver the child”, the 23-year-old Friday said she would abide by the court’s directive. But the woman, who was allegedly abducted from outside her home in July, 2014 and held in captivity for eight-nine months in […]
Told by HC to give birth, rape victim pushed to corner Read More »
The Delhi High Court stayed Friday the order of St Stephen’s College principal Valson Thampu suspending the student editor of its banned e-magazine for “breach in college discipline”, and asked the college and Delhi University whether anyone can be suspended for “speaking to the media”. Justice Vibhu Bakhru, who issued a stay on the one-week
Delhi High Court stays suspension of St Stephen’s student by principal Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 2749 of 2015 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.3172/2014] [Civil Appeal No. 2750 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No. 16851/2014] [Civil Appeal No. 2751 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No. 26518/2014] [Civil Appeal No. 2752 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No. 27218/2014] [Civil Appeal No. 2753
[Civil Appeal No.4021 of 2007] [Civil Appeal No.4590 of 2007] [Civil Appeal No.738 of 2008] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. These three appeals seek to challenge the common order of the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 29th January, 2007 passed in Second Appeal Nos. 543 to 545 of 1994 by which the decree of
[Civil Appeal Nos.2865-2866 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.36943-36944 of 2013] O R D E R ANIL R. DAVE, J. Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. We have noted the fact that the learned counsel appearing for the appellants had given consent before the High Court for appointment of Mr.
Recent SC Judgement – Union of India Vs. Gurdayal Singh – 09.03.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos.6097-6100 of 2009] [Civil Appeal No.6101 of 2009] [Civil Appeal No.6102 of 2009] [Civil Appeal No.6103 of 2009] [Civil Appeal No.6104 of 2009] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. Civil Appeal Nos. 6101, 6102, 6103 and 6104 of 2009 are filed by the State against the common judgment dated 15.06.2007 passed by the High
Recent SC Judgement – Anil Joshi Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh – 09.03.15 Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Supreme court on Friday stayed proceedings against Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal in two defamation cases, one filed by BJP leader Nitin Gadkari and the other by a lawyer. A bench of Justice Dipak Misra and Justice PC Pant has also agreed to hear Kejriwal’s plea for decriminalizing defamation law. Facing repeated
SC stays proceedings against Arvind Kejriwal in two defamation cases Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday extended former Tamil Nadu chief minister J Jayalalithaa’s bail till the disposal of her appeal against conviction in a disproportionate assets case by the Karnataka high court. The high court judge hearing her appeal has informed the court that he would not be able to dispose of the
DA case: SC extends Jaya’s bail till May 12 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 395 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No.3634 of 2014] Madan B. Lokur, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The question before us relates to the refusal by the Madras High Court to issue a writ of habeas corpus for the production of the children of Surya Vadanan and Mayura Vadanan. The
Recent SC Judgement – Surya Vadanan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu – 27.02.15 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal Nos.1279-1281 of 2011] VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. These Appeals assail the Judgment dated 13.07.2010 of the learned Single Judge, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow, who had affirmed the conviction of the Appellants and the sentencing under Sections 498A and 304B of the IPC pronounced by the VIIIth Additional District & Sessions
Recent SC Judgement – Ramakant Mishra @ Lalu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh – 27.02.15 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
