admin

[Criminal Appeal No(S). 230 of 2013] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. Though, this Court vide order dated 18.09.2012 appointed Mr. Parmanand Katara as Amicus Curiae, he has not appeared. This is an unfortunate situation and we do not appreciate the same. However, on our request, Mr. Mohan Pandey, learned counsel who was present in the Court […]

[Criminal Appeal No. 519 of 2010] S. A. BOBDE, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the accused Gurjit Singh alias Gora and Surjit Singh alias Sukha, from the Judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, convicting the appellants – accused under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the

[Civil Appeal No. 1569 of 2007] [Civil Appeal No. 3214 of 2011] [Slp(C) No. 10080 of 2014] PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. 1. Civil Appeal No. 1569 of 2007 is directed against the judgment and order dated 31.03.2005 of the High Court of Kerala by which in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 256(2) of the Income

[Civil Appeal No. 610 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No. 36643 of 2014] Dipak Misra, J. 1. The issue that has emanated for consideration in this appeal is whether in the obtaining factual matrix, especially regard being had to the nature of the arbitration clause, the High Court is justified in setting aside the

[Criminal Appeal No. 2153 of 2011] Dipak Misra, J. 1. In this appeal, the assail is to the judgment and order dated 31.8.2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Criminal Appeal No. 417 of 2001 whereby the Division Bench has dismissed the appeal while affirming the judgment and order dated 17.01.2001 of the

[Criminal Appeal No. 2238 of 2010] [Criminal Appeal No.425 of 2015 @ SLP (CRL.) No. 9896 of 2011] [Criminal Appeal No. 636 of 2012] Dipak Misra, J. 1. Leave granted in SLP (Crl.) No. 9896 of 2011 2. The present appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 25.03.2009 passed by the High

[Civil Appeal No. 6161/2010] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 10.11.2008 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in FAO (HMA) No.266/2004, dismissing the appellant’s appeal and declining to pass the decree of divorce. 2. Marriage between the appellant-husband and respondent-wife was solemnized on 10.5.1997 and