Taking stock of the progress made in implementation of various reforms to speed up justice delivery system, continuation of morning/evening courts in lower judiciary for expeditious disposal of the growing number of pending cases, improving court infrastructure were some of the issues discussed on the first day of the three-day conference of Chief Justices that […]
CJs’ meet discusses reforms, court infra Read More »
Two judges of the Supreme Court opposed the decision of Chief Justice of India H L Dattu to call a conference of judges on Good Friday and one of them, Justice Kurian Joseph, said “I am deeply hurt… shocked by the tenor” of the response from the CJI rejecting his suggestion while raising questions of
Racist emails released Friday by the city of Ferguson indicate most were sent by a former city court clerk to two police officers, and there’s no indication other city employees were involved. The emails were discovered during an investigation into the August 9 fatal shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown, who was black and unarmed, by
Racist e-mails sent by city court clerk Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.5099 of 2006] [C.A. No.5100 of 2006] [C.A. No.5101 of 2006] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. These appeals have been preferred by the appellants against common judgment dated 27th December, 2004 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Writ Petition Nos. 20106, 20350, 20539 and
Recent SC Judgement – M. Surender Reddy Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh – 18.02.15 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 262 of 2009] Dipak Misra, J. 1. The present appeal, by special leave, is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Appeal No. 444/2005 whereby the Division Bench has affirmed the conviction recorded by the learned Additional Sessions
Recent SC Judgement – Ghusabhai Raisangbhai Chorasiya Vs. State of Gujarat – 18.02.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 7796 OF 1997] Dipak Misra, J. 1. The appellant No. 1 is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 for the purpose of setting up a 235 MW Gas based power project at Jegurupadu, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh at an estimated cost of Rs.839 crores and the appellant No. 2 is a
Recent SC Judgement – GVK Industries Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer – 17.02.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 1966 of 2015 arising out of SLP No. 31615 of 2014] [Civil Appeal No. 1967 of 2015 arising out of SLP No. 32581 of 2014] VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. Leave granted in both the Special Leave Petitions. 2. Civil Appeal of 2015 arising out of SLP(C) No.31615 of 2014 assails the Judgment
Recent SC Judgement – Roxann Sharma Vs. Arun Sharma – 17.02.15 Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Delhi high court on Thursday expressed concern over identity of child survivors of sexual offences being disclosed. HC has directed trial courts and hospitals to ensure that guidelines laid down by it are scrupulously followed in all cases relating to children. The court said it is the duty of the hospital where
Protect identity in child rape: Delhi HC Read More »
BENGALURU: Karnataka’s private schools, including CBSE and ICSE institutions, are again headed for a legal battle with the state government over the language issue. The government’s decision to make Kannada the compulsory medium of instruction from classes 1 to 5 in all schools has rankled them. On March 30, the state %legislature passed the Right
Karnataka schools set to take language policy to court policy Read More »
PANAJI: Goa minister Francisco Mickky Pacheco, who was convicted for slapping a government servant, on Friday resigned from cabinet. Pacheco on Wednesday filed a review petition before the Supreme Court, pleading for “justice” in the 2006 case of assault on an electricity department junior engineer. “I have pleaded with the SC that I should be
Slap case: Convicted Goa minister Francisco Mickky Pacheco resigns Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
