[Civil Appeal Nos. 1956-1957 of 2015 @ SLP (C) Nos.11924-11925 of 2012] Udai Bhanu Mishra & Ors. etc. Vs. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad through its Registrar General & Ors. etc. [Civil Appeal Nos. 1992-1993 of 2015 @ SLP (C) Nos.18597-18598 of 2012] Arvind Kumar Sudhanshu & Ors. Vs. High Court of Judicature at […]
[Civil Appeal No. 1970 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No. 28265/2014] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 16.04.2014 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad dismissing the appellant’s First Appeal No.282 of 2014 observing that the Insurance Company was not liable to
[Civil Appeal No.2532 of 2010] [C.A. Nos. 1972-1973 of 2015 @ S.L.P. (C) Nos.10172-10173 of 2012] [C.A. Nos. 1974-1975 of 2015 @ S.L.P. (C) Nos.14651-14652 of 2012] [C.A. Nos. 1976-1977 of 2015 @ S.L.P. (C) Nos.19708-19709 of 2012] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions. 2. A common question
Recent SC Judgement – Union of India Vs. V.K. Krishnan – 17.02.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos. 1942-1943 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P (C) Nos.26832-26833 of 2009] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. These appeals have been filed by the appellants against the impugned judgment and order dated 23.03.2009 passed by the High Court of Kerala, at Ernakulam, in Civil Revision Petition Nos. 1172 and 1173 of 1997(D), whereby
Recent SC Judgement – N.M. Krishnakumari Vs. Thalakkal Assiya – 17.02.15 Read More »
Serena Williams abused her racket, scolded herself and even made angry faces at the sun. In the end, as usual, she took out her frustration on the ball. The seven-time Key Biscayne champion overcame her annoyance and shaky play Wednesday for her 700th career victory, beating Sabine Lisicki 7-6 (4), 1-6, 6-3 to reach the
Serena Williams claims 700th career win, reaches Miami Open semis Read More »
Government has moved the Supreme Court seeking review of its March 17 verdict setting aside a 2014 notification of erstwhile UPA regime to include Jats in the central list of the Other Backward Classes (OBC) in nine states to accord quota benefits to them. The NDA government moved the apex court days after a meeting
Centre moves SC for review of verdict scrapping quota for Jats Read More »
NEW DELHI: A misconduct of an employee cannot entitle the government to cut pension and other post retirement benefit, the Delhi High Court has held. Only when the misconduct is “grave” can the employer slash benefits. “For a retired government servant a cut in pension can be ordered if the misconduct of which he is
Misconduct no basis to deny pension: Delhi HC Read More »
[Writ Petition (CRL.) No. 218 of 2013] M.Y.Eqbal, J. 1. Petitioner, a young girl of 22 years who hails from the State of Uttar Pradesh, has filed this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India for the enforcement of her fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of
Recent SC Judgement – Rashmi Behl Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh – 17.02.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.6156 of 2005] M.Y. Eqbal, J.: 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 27.11.2003 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Madras in OSA No.175 of 1998, dismissing the appeal of the appellant, upholding inter alia the disbursements made by Single Judge of the sale proceeds
[Civil Appeal No. 1912 of 2015 arising out of SLP No. 31761 of 2013] VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The Appellant assails his suspension which was effected on 30.9.2011 and has been extended and continued ever since. In November, 2006, he was posted as the Defence Estate Officer (DEO) Kashmir Circle, Jammu &
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
