admin

[Civil Appeal No. 7513 of 2009] VIKRAMAJIT SEN,J. 1. Notice was ordered in the Special Leave Petition (now Appeal) on 9th July, 2007, but while doing so, this Court had specifically clarified that: “Pending further orders the impugned order passed by the High Court shall continue to operate”. The impugned Order decreed the suit filed […]

[Civil Appeal No. 412 of 2015 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.5236/2014] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal by special leave arises out of the judgment dated 3.9.2012 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, in and by which, the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant-workman thereby, confirming the

[Civil Appeal Nos.409-410 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos. 20840-41/2014] R. BANUMATHI, J. Delay condoned. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals arise out of the impugned Order dated 18.03.2013 passed by the High Court of Bombay Bench at Nagpur, in W.P. No.1341 of 2013 and Order dated 22.11.2013 passed in the Review Application

[Criminal Appeal No. 82 of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No. 9447/2012] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises out of the judgment of the Calcutta High Court dated 13.2.2012 passed in C.R.A. No.747/2008, in and by which, the High Court confirmed the conviction of the appellants under Section 302/34 IPC

[Civil Appeal No. 415 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.21799 of 2014] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant-husband against the judgment dated 9th July, 2014 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench in M.F.A. No.22031/2013(FC). By the

[Civil Appeal Nos. 354-355 of 2015 Special Leave Petition (C) Nos.7939-7940 of 2004] H.L. Dattu, CJI. 1. Leave granted. 2. The issue that arises for our consideration and decision in the present appeals is whether an “Official Liquidator” is a “dealer” within the meaning of section 2 (viii) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act,