MUMBAI: The CBI court dropped charges against senior Gujarat police officer Geeta Johri after it found that the CBI had not taken mandatory sanction from the state government before chargesheeting her in the fake encounter case. The court discharged senior police officer in a case where she was allegedly manipulating investigation of three fake encounters […]
CBI court drops charges against Gujarat top cop Geeta Johri Read More »
A special CBI court on Monday dropped charges against Gujarat Additional Director General of Police Geeta Johari in connection with Sohrabuddin Sheikh and Tulsiram Prajapati fake encounter cases, for want of mandatory sanction from Maharashtra government for her prosecution. “Prosecution against Johari stands dropped for want of sanction”, observed special CBI judge MB Gosavi. The
Fake encounter cases: Charges against Geeta Johari dropped Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos. 348-349 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 4897-4898 of 2014] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellants have filed these appeals against the impugned common judgment and order dated 05.06.2013 passed in M.F.A. No. 21286 of 2012 (MV) C/W M.F.A. No. 21290 of 2012 by the High
[Civil Appeal No. 347 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No. 976 of 2014] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. This appeal has been filed by the appellants against the impugned Judgment and order dated 23.07.2012 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore wherein the High Court partly allowed and
Recent SC Judgement – Kanhsingh Vs. Tukaram –13.01.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 346 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 1532 of 2014] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. This appeal is filed by the workman, aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in L.P.A. No. 2245 of 2011 (O & M) dated 19.09.2013 affirming the
Recent SC Judgement – Jasmer Singh Vs. State of Haryana –13.01.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 324 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.14024/2013] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is filed by the defendants against the judgment and order dated 06.12.2012 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench at Dharwad in Regular First Appeal No. 3052
Recent SC Judgement – Shasidhar Vs. Smt. Ashwini Uma Mathad –13.01.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 325-326 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.5029-5030 of 2011] The Chairman, Joint Action Committee of Employees Teachers and Workers A.P. Vs. D. Narsing Rao & Ors. etc. etc [Civil Appeal No. 327 of 2015 Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.5031 of 2011] C. NAGAPPAN, J. Leave
Recent SC Judgement – Jt. Collector Ranga Reddy District Vs. D. Narsing Rao –13.01.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 117 of 2005] Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. 1. The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as, the SEBI Act) was enacted to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate, the securities market. The Securities and Exchange Board of
[Civil Appeal Nos. 297-298 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.13121-13122 of 2011] [Civil Appeal Nos. 299-300 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.11597-11598 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 301 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.11606 of 2011] [Civil Appeal Nos. 302-303 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.13123-13124 of
Recent SC Judgement – Sudhir N. Vs. State of Kerala –12.01.15 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 1592 of 2011] VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. This Appeal has been filed against the Judgment dated 16.12.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissing the appeal and affirming the conviction and sentence passed against the Appellant by the Trial Court under Sections 304B and
Recent SC Judgement – Sher Singh @ Partapa Vs. State of Haryana –09.01.15 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
