[Civil Appeal No. 193 of 2015 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.32039 of 2012] R.F. Nariman, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeal arises out of a public auction conducted by the Delhi Development Authority (“DDA”) wherein the appellant made the highest bid for Plot No.2-A, Bhikaji Cama Place, District Centre, New Delhi for […]
[Criminal Appeal No. 34 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No. 2961 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 35 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No. 3161 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal Nos. 36-37 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No. 3326-3327 of 2013] A.K. SIKRI, J. Leave
Recent SC Judgement – Sunil Bharti Mittal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation –09.01.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 209 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 4385 of 2010] [Contempt Petition (Civil) No. 320 of 2010 in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 5046 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 210 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 4483 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 211 of
[Criminal Appeal No. 513 of 2008] T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. The appellant was tried and convicted for offences punishable under Sections 376 and 302 IPC. For the offence of rape punishable under Section 376, he was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of 10 years besides a fine of Rs.1000/- and default sentence of
Recent SC Judgement – Darga Ram @ Gunga Vs. State of Rajasthan –08.01.15 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 1401 of 2008] Dipak Misra, J. 1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence recorded by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No. 245-DB of 1998 whereby the Division Bench has reversed the decision rendered by the learned Additional
Recent SC Judgement – Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Haryana –08.01.15 Read More »
[Transfer Case (Civil) No. 48 of 2010] [T.C. (C) No.7/2011], [T.C. (C) No.45/2010] [T.C. (C) No.47/2010], [T.C. (C) No.46/2010] [T.C. (C) No.6/2011], [T.C. (C) No.19/2011], [T.C. (C) No.23/2011], [T.C. (C) No.20/2011], [T.C. (C) No.21/2011] [SLP (C) No.10903/2011], [T.C. (C) No.82/2011], [T.C. (C) No.83/2011] [T.C. (C) No.49/2010], [T.C. (C) No.27/2014] [T.C. (C) No.28/2014] ANIL R. DAVE,
Recent SC Judgement – Manojbhai N. Shah Vs. Union of India –07.01.15 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 2371 of 2010] Madan B. Lokur, J. 1. The appellant (Raghuvendra) is aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 23rd October, 2008 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Criminal Appeal No.754 of 2000. By the judgment and order under appeal, the conviction of the appellant for an offence punishable
Recent SC Judgement – Raghuvendra Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh –07.01.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 50 of 2015 arising out of SLP(C) No.1707 of 2014] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellants have preferred this appeal against order dated 1st August, 2013 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in W.P. (C) No.2736 of 2013. By the impugned order, the High
Recent SC Judgement – Union of India through Secretary Vs. Anju Jain –06.01.15 Read More »
CHENNAI: Taunt and demand from advocates notwithstanding, a division bench of the Madras high court on Tuesday refused to rescue itself from hearing a public interest litigation opposing a new list of nine names recommended by the court for appointment as judges of the court. Within a week after the high court forwarded the list
Madras HC refuses to transfer PIL on judge selection to a different bench Read More »
LOS ANGELES: He is the yoga guru who built an empire on sweat and swagger. He has a stable of luxury cars and a Beverly Hills mansion. During trainings for hopeful yoga teachers, he paces a stage in a black Speedo and holds forth on life, sex and the transformative power of his brand of
Schism emerges in Bikram Yoga empire amid rape claims Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
