MUMBAI: Bombay High Court has said the Maharashtra government is bound by statutory provisions to undertake a review of minimum wages payable to workers in the powerloom sector at least once in five years. A division bench of Chief Justice Mohit Shah and Justice B P Colabawalla on February 2 heard a public interest litigation […]
Revise minimum powerloom wages every 5 years : HC to Maha govt Read More »
AHMEDABAD: Thirteen years after the incident, a SIT court in Himmatnagar on Friday acquitted six accused persons in the killing of three British nationals near Prantij during the 2002 riots. Special judge I C Shah exonerated Mithanbhai Patel, Chandu alias Prahlad Patel, Ramesh Patel, Manoj Patel, Rajesh Patel and Kalabhai Patel, all residents of Prantij
Court acquits six accused in post Godhra violence Read More »
AHMEDABAD: Forty-eight of 66 land owners, who allegedly run resorts and hotels without permission in the restricted buffer zone of Gir sanctuary, have approached Gujarat high court after they were issued notice by the electricity company for their alleged use of electric supply for commercial purposes. The authorities woke up after the HC directed the
Property owners around Gir sanctuary move HC Read More »
MUMBAI: Bombay High Court has rapped the Maharashtra government for putting the onus on Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation to locate sites for night shelters for the homeless in Mumbai. “Now you want municipal corporation to identify the sites?” asked a bench of Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Anil on February 26 when informed that Brihanmumbai Municipal
HC raps Maharashtra government for passing the buck to BMC on night shelters Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 1592 of 2011] VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. This Appeal has been filed against the Judgment dated 16.12.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissing the appeal and affirming the conviction and sentence passed against the Appellant by the Trial Court under Sections 304B and
Recent SC Judgement – Sher Singh @ Partapa Vs. State of Haryana –09.01.15 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 1889/2008] State of Rajasthan Vs. Rasool Shah & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No. 1904/2008] State of Rajasthan Vs. Mst. Halima & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No. 1938/2008] State of Rajasthan Vs. Iqbal & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No. 17/2009] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. These appeals arise out of the judgment dated 20.08.2007 passed in Criminal
Recent SC Judgement – Ahmed Shah Vs. State of Rajasthan –09.01.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos. 234-245 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.1645-1646 of 2013] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals have been preferred against the final judgment and order dated 27th March, 2012 in Writ Petition No.2331 of 2010 and order dated 10th October, 2012 in Review Petition No.212 of 2012
Recent SC Judgement – Sitikanatha Mishra Vs. Union of India –09.01.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 2701 of 2006] Dipak Misra, J. BPL Limited, the respondent herein, was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 (for brevity ‘the Act”) and on 16.4.1963, certificate of incorporation in the name of the company as British Physical Laboratories India Pvt. Ltd. was issued. The company became deemed public company and the word
NEW DELHI: A DMK leader on Thursday moved the Supreme Court seeking stay on proceedings before the Karnataka high court on an appeal filed by former Tamil Nadu chief minister J Jayalalithaa in a disproportionate assets case and removal of the public prosecutor. DMK general secretary K Anbazhagan sought removal of public prosecutor in the
CHENNAI: Indicting the Tamil Nadu government for its cavalier attitude in obeying judicial rulings, the Madras high court on Thursday said the state government was making a mockery of court orders. The first bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice M M Sundresh, referring to the multi-member committee formed by the court to
Don’t make mockery of court orders, Madras HC warns Tamil Nadu govt Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
