[Civil Appeal No. 7133 of 2008] VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. The Respondent herein, No. 7773409X Havildar (Military Police) Purushottam, was enrolled in the Corps of Military Police, on 7th June 1983. On 27th November 2001, while the Respondent was posted to 916 Provost Unit (General Reserve Engineer Force, or GREF), he was detailed as a […]
Recent SC Judgement – Union of India Vs. Purushottam –05.01.15 Read More »
CUTTACK: Providing huge relief to Puri hotel owners, the Orissa high court on Friday made it clear that the Puri Konark Development Authority (PKDA) has no power to order demolition of any illegal hotel. Hearing to a petition of Puri Hotel Association, the bench of Justice Biswanath Rath observed that PKDA is just an implementing
HC: Urban body has no power to order demolition in Puri Read More »
CHANDIGARH: Taking up the plea of whistleblower Indian Forest Services officer Sanjiv Chaturvedi to recall the orders to form a special investigation team (SIT) into the suspicious death of a forest official in 2009, the Punjab and Haryana high court on Friday issued a notice to the Haryana government. The court, however, refused to grant
HC notice to Haryana on Sanjiv Chaturvedi’s plea to recall orders on SIT Read More »
BHUBANESWAR: In an election case, the Orissa high court on Friday issued notice to senior BJD leader Rabi Narayan Nanda to explain in three weeks why criminal proceedings should not be initiated against him for filing a false affidavit. Nanda had filed a petition challenging the election of Tara Prasad Bahinipati of Congress from Jeypore
False affidavit in poll case: Rabi Nanda in soup Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 20 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No. 921 of 2014] VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The Appellant before us was the Defendant in a suit filed by the Respondent-Plaintiff praying for a decree of mandatory injunction directing the Appellant to hand over vacant possession of the property in
Recent SC Judgement – Om Prakash (D) through LRS. Vs. Shanti Devi –5.01.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 3655 of 2010] PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 27.8.2009, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, in Special Appeal No. 1167 of 1999, whereby said Court has partly allowed the appeal, and substituted the punishment of removal awarded to the appellant, by
Recent SC Judgement – Diwan Singh Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India –05.01.15 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No(S). 534-535 of 2012] KURIAN, J.: The appellants faced trial under Section 498A read with Section 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’). The trial court acquitted them under Section 304B of IPC but convicted them under Section 498A of IPC. The
Recent SC Judgement – Banarsi Dass Vs. State of Haryana –18.12.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 11604 /2014 arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 15314 of 2014] KURIAN, J.: Leave granted. Once a judicial authority takes a decision under Section 8(1) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) declining to refer the dispute pending before it to arbitration and the said decision
BENGALURU: The Karnataka High Court on Thursday asked the state government to specify by February 25 its stand on obeying the May 2014 Supreme Court order on medium of instruction. Justice B V Nagarathna gave this direction while hearing a petition filed by the Associated Managements of Government Recognized English Medium Schools in Karnataka (KAMS)
Medium of instruction: Specify stand on SC order, HC tells govt Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court of India on Friday allowed Prasar Bharati to share live feed of World Cup cricket matches with cable operators. The apex court overturned an earlier order from Delhi High Court restraining public broadcaster to share feed with cable operators. Earlier, Star Sports, the official broadcast partner of World Cup, had
SC allows Prasar Bharti to telecast World Cup matches Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
