[Civil Appeal No. 11525 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P.(c) No. 10968 of 2010] Abhay Manohar Sapre,J. 1. Leave granted 2. This civil appeal is filed by the State of U.P. against the judgment dated 31.07.2009 passed by Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Special Appeal No. 854 of 2009 […]
[Civil Appeal Nos.11690-11712 of 2014 arising out of SLP [C] Nos.20539-20561/2011] [CA No.11719/2014 @ SLP [C] No.17316/2011] [CA No.11714-16/2014 @ SLP [C] Nos.17119-17121/2011] [CA No.11725/2014 @ SLP [C] No.17342/2011] [CA No.11722/2014 @ SLP [C] No.17339/2011] [CA No.11728/2014 @ SLP [C] No.19083/2011] [CA No.11730/2014 @ SLP [C] No.19084/2011] [CA No.11753/2014 @ SLP [C] No.20569/2011] [CA No.11771/2014
Recent SC Judgement – B.A. Linga Reddy Vs. Karnataka State Transport Authority –18.12.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 11527 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.11684 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 11528 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No 35892 CC No. 14663 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 11530 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.35914 .CC No. 20144 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 11531 of 2014
Recent SC Judgement – State of Punjab Vs. Rafiq Masih –18.12.14 Read More »
[Special Leave Petition (C) No.27519 of 2014] Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. 1. The petitioner before this Court, took on rent the shop in question, from the respondent-landlord, in the year 1979. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner, that after taking the shop on rent, the basic rental was enhanced from
Recent SC Judgement – Satendra Singh Vs. Vinod Kumar Bhalotia –18.12.14 Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Delhi Police registered a first information report (FIR) late on Wednesday evening against Rajendra Pachauri, the director-general of The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) after a woman research analyst lodged a complaint alleging harassment. The FIR alleges Pachauri committed offences under Sections 354, 354A, 354D, 506 of IPC, which deal with outraging
FIR against TERI’s Pachauri in harassment case Read More »
NEW DELHI: CBI today filed its final probe report in a coal block allocation case allegedly involving former Coal Secretary P C Parakh, Hindalco and others before the special court which will consider it on March 11. Senior public prosecutor V K Sharma told the court that the agency has completed the investigation and one
Coal scam: CBI completes probe in Hindalco case Read More »
NEW DELHI: Supreme Court on Thursday extended the stay on arrest of Teesta Setalvad and her husband. The top court had earlier stayed their arrest till February 19. Earlier during the hearing, SC asked Gujarat government why Teesta Setalvad and her husband were needed in custody for questioning? The top court noted that it is
SC extends stay on arrest of Teesta Setalvad and her husband Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos. 5874-5875 of 2009] Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. 1. Consequent upon their selection, the appellants were inducted into the Police Department of the State of Bihar, by way of direct recruitment, as Steno Sub-Inspectors of Police. Appellant no. 1 – Kumod Kumar was appointed as such on 10.4.1982. He joined his duties on
Recent SC Judgement – Kumod Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand. –18.12.14 Read More »
[Writ Petition (Civil) No. 792 of 2014] Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed by a former Additional District and Sessions Judge of the Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. The factual narration in the writ petition incorporates allegations of sexual harassment aimed at the petitioner, at the behest of a
[Criminal Appeal Nos.2329-2331 of 2009] [Criminal Appeal No.2327 of 2009] [Criminal Appeal No.2328 of 2009] C. NAGAPPAN, J. All these criminal appeals have arisen out of the common judgment dated 17.09.2007 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The appellants/accused in Criminal Appeal Nos. 2327 and 2328 of 2009 numbering 2,
Recent SC Judgement – State of Punjab Vs. Jagga Singh. –17.12.14 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
