[Civil Appeal No. 7130 of 2002] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the judgment delivered by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Writ Appeal No.1683 of 1998 on 14th August, 2002, this appeal has been preferred by the South Central Railway Employees Co-Op. Credit Society Employees’ Union. 2. It is necessary to […]
CHANDIGARH: The Punjab and Haryana high court on Wednesday refused to stay the screening of ‘MSG — Messenger of God’, the controversial film starring Sirsa-based Dera Sacha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh, paving the way for its scheduled release on February 13. The court, however, issued notices to the Censor Board, states of Haryana
HC paves way for MSG release on Feb 13 Read More »
A special court on Thursday granted bail to suspended additional director general of police (ADGP) PP Pandey in the 2004 fake encounter case of Ishrat Jahan and three others. This is the first instance in which an accused has been granted regular bail. Pandey is the seniormost IPS officer to be arrested in a fake
Ishrat Jahan fake encounter case: Gujarat’s suspended ADGP Pandey gets bail Read More »
The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Wednesday declined to stay the release of controversial film ‘Messenger of God (MSG)’, featuring Sirsa-based Dera Sacha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh. As the petition filed in public interest by a Mohali-based trust against the film’s release came up for hearing, a division bench of the High
Punjab HC declines to stay the release of Gurmeet Ram Rahim’s MSG Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.10836 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.30832 of 2011] [Civil Appeal Nos.10837-10839 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos. 31048-31050 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No.10840 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.33140 of 2011] [Civil Appeal Nos.10841-10843 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos.33141-33143 of 2011] [Civil Appeal
[Civil Appeal No.10778 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 16539 of 2010] JUDGMENT S. A. BOBDE, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The question that has arisen in this appeal is: whether a party to an arbitration proceeding may be permitted to raise objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
[Criminal Appeal No. 1152 of 2009] SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. The sole appellant, Kanchanben is the mother-in-law of the deceased and is facing conviction under Section 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC) with sentence of RI for eight years and penalty of Rs.1,000/- with default stipulation. She has
Recent SC Judgement – Kanchanben Purshottambhai Bhanderi Vs. State of Gujarat – 05.12.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 3872 of 2009] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 19.12.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Appeal Suit No. 1842 of 1996 which in turn arises out of judgment and decree dated 15.03.1996 passed
In a setback to the the Centre, the Supreme Court Tuesday dismissed its petitions to get all the cases, pending before various high courts against the coal ordinance, transferred to the apex court. The order virtually means that there would be no monitoring by the apex court on the auction process, which requires to be
Coal ordinance case: You have brought it, you will have to defend it, SC tells Centre Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.1002 of 2010] J.S.KHEHAR, J. This is an appeal filed at the behest of the landlord, whose plea for eviction against the respondent-tenant was turned down, by the impugned order dated 03.12.2007, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (hereinafter referred to as `the High Court’). It is essential to record,
Recent SC Judgement – Vishwanath Prasad Jaiswal Vs. Satya Narain Sharma – 04.12.14 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
