[Civil Appeal No.10785 of 2014 @ Special Leaves Petition (Civil) No.22941 of 2014] O R D E R Uday U. Lalit, J. 1. Leave granted. This appeal seeks to challenge the order dated 30.07.2014 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Writ Petition No.4274 of 2010 to the extent it directed the appellant to […]
[Criminal Appeal No. 2530 of 2014 @ Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.2038 of 2013] UDAY UMESH LALIT, J. 1. This petition for special leave to appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 21.02.2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-6656 of 2011. Leave granted. 2. On 28.09.2010, a complaint
Recent SC Judgement – Zorawar Singh Vs. Gurbax Singh Bains. – 04.12.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 10784 of 2014 @ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.24652 of 2013] Uday U. Lalit, J. 1. Leave granted. This appeal challenges the order dated 30.05.2013 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Arbitration Petition No.212 of 2011 appointing an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the present parties. 2. The respondent
A local court on Monday dismissed the bail application of Rattan Lubana, one of the gang of three unemployed youths who were arrested for blackmail and extorting money from students of some high-end schools in the city last month. Civil Judge Senior Division K K Jain, while dismissing Lubana’s application, held that his crime was
Court dismisses bail plea of extortion accused, says his crime heinous Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to examine whether municipal bodies can kill stray dogs merely on a complaint that they have become a “nuisance” to the public. A bench of Justices Dipak Misra and Prafulla C Pant said that it will look into the contradiction in animal welfare laws on what constitutes
SC to decide if civic body can kill stray dogs Read More »
Aam Aadmi Party chief Arvind Kejriwal today tweeted declaring that five of his party members would submit an application to the Supreme Court for a special SIT probe into funding of BJP, Congress as well as their own. Kejriwal’s decision comes a day after a breakway volunteer group of AAP alleged that the party indulged
AAP to move SC for SIT probe into funding of BJP, Congress and their own Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.119 of 2013] Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J. 1. This appeal, at the instance of accused Nos.1 to 3 is directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No.787 of 2007 dated 01.03.2012 by which conviction and sentence imposed on the Appellants
Recent SC Judgement – Noushad @ Noushad Pasha Vs. State of Karnataka – 03.12.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.10707 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.29322 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.10708 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.9869 of 2008] [Civil Appeal No.10709 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.30528 of 2009] [Civil Appeal No.10710 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.29320 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.10711
[Civil Appeal No. 1999 of 2008] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. The question arising for determination in the present appeal has been succinctly formulated by the High Court in the following terms: “Whether, the plan first prepared and notified under Section 21 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (‘MRTP Act’) is the final
Recent SC Judgement – Prafulla C. Dave Vs. Municipal Commissioner – 03.12.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 10717 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 33002 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 10718 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.34306 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 10716 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.4571 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 10715 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.13828
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
