NEW DELHI: Politically and historically Pakistan detests anything that has to do with India, but when it comes to the legal field the Supreme Court of Pakistan (SCP) has no such inhibitions and often looks up to the Supreme Court of India (SCI) for guidance. One such occasion was a fortnight ago on December 17, […]
Pak SC relies on Indian SC rulings in election cases Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 9744 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.5694 of 2013] Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. 1. The petitioner-wife Dipanwita Roy and the respondent-husband Ronobroto Roy, were married at Calcutta. Their marriage was registered on 9.2.2003. The present controversy emerges from a petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Recent SC Judgement – Dipanwita Roy Vs. Ronobroto Roy – 15.10.14 Read More »
[Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 19552 of 2013] Chelameswar, J. 1. The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs in suit No .632 of 2010 on the file of the Special Civil Judge (Senior Division), Thane and the respondents are the defendants therein. For the sake of convenience they are referred to in this judgment as they
[Civil Appeal No. 9722 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.13844 of 2013] VIKRAMAJIT SEN,J. Leave granted. 1. The Appellants essay to restore the concurrent views of the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Rewari, in Civil Suit No.308 of 1997 in terms of the Judgment and Decree dated 27.8.2002, as also the Judgment and
Recent SC Judgement – Sarjeet Singh (D) through LRS. Vs. Hari Singh – 15.10.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos. 9689-9690 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos.25939-25940 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 9691 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.3568 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 9692 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.3570 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 9693 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.3969 of
HYDERABAD: The Godavari River Management Board (GRMB) on Tuesday sought the Centre’s intervention to resolve ownership dispute over the Sileru hydro electric project located in mandals that were recently transferred from Telangana to Andhra Pradesh. The GRMB headed by MS Agarwal held a meeting with principal secretaries of Telangana and AP irrigation departments at Jalasoudha
Now, Sileru project row in Centre’s court Read More »
NEW DELHI: Even as right-wing groups protest against the screening of Aamir Khan-starrer ‘PK’, the information and broadcasting (I&B) ministry said it cannot act on a film once it has been cleared by the Censor Board. Speaking on the issue, minister of state for I&B Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore, however, added that state governments could act
Centre on ‘PK’ row: Can’t act as censors cleared film Read More »
HYDERABAD: In a setback to the AP Government, the Hyderabad high court on Tuesday suspended the order of the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) regime nullifying all existing temple administration committees in the state. Putting a full stop to the practice of changing temple committees each time there is a change in the political regime at
Hyderabad HC restores temple committees Read More »
MUMBAI: In a major victory for BJP president Amit Shah, a special CBI court in Mumbai on Tuesday held that there was no legal evidence against him in the Sohrabuddin Shaikh fake encounter case of 2005 and discharged him as an accused. “There is substance in the contention of Shah’s counsel S V Raju that
Sohrabuddin Shaikh fake encounter case: CBI court drops case against Amit Shah Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.785 of 2010] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the Order dated 22nd December, 2005, of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No.1818 of 2004 setting aside the conviction of the accused- respondent Nos.1 and 2 passed by the Trial Court under Sections 498-A
Recent SC Judgement – State of Karnataka Vs. Smt. Suvarnnamma – 14.10.14 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
