Law Intellect India

admin

Recent SC Judgement – Raunaq Education Foundation Vs. State of Haryana – 14.10.14

[Special Leave Petition (C) No. 28189 of 2014 Cc No.2940 of 2014] [Special Leave Petition (C) No. 28195-96 of 2014 Cc No.1707 of 2014] O R D E R ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. Delay condoned. Heard on merits. 2. These petitions have been preferred against the Judgment and Order dated 27th September, 2013 passed […]

Recent SC Judgement – Raunaq Education Foundation Vs. State of Haryana – 14.10.14 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Rajib Ranjan Vs. R. Vijaykumar – 14.10.14

[Criminal Appeal No(S). 729-732 of 2010] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. These appeals are filed by four appellants, who were arrayed as accused persons in the complaint case No.183/2007 filed by the respondent herein before the Court of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruchirapalli, Tamil Nadu. The complaint has been filed under Sections 120-B, 468, 420 and 500

Recent SC Judgement – Rajib Ranjan Vs. R. Vijaykumar – 14.10.14 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – A.K. Devaiah Vs. State of Karnataka – 14.10.14

[Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 2007] M.Y. EQBAL, J. 1. The instant Criminal Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 25-8-2005 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No. 828 of 1999 whereby setting aside the judgment of acquittal passed by the trial court allowed the appeal filed

Recent SC Judgement – A.K. Devaiah Vs. State of Karnataka – 14.10.14 Read More »

Suspension of Lakhvi’s detention order by Pakistani court sparks outrage in India

NEW DELHI: The suspension of detention order for 26/11 mastermind Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi by Islamabad High Court on Monday sparked another round of outrage in India with New Delhi telling Pakistan that it was refusing to learn even from the recent barbaric killing of children in Peshawar. Foreign secretary Sujatha Singh summoned Pakistani high commissioner

Suspension of Lakhvi’s detention order by Pakistani court sparks outrage in India Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – R.N. Agarwal Vs. R.C. Bansal – 14.10.14

[Criminal Appeal Nos. 2199-2201 of 2014 arising out of SLP (CRL.) Nos.1730-1732 of 2011] M.Y. EQBAL, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 2.2.2011 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Crl.M.C. Nos.2955 and 3779 of 2009 and Crl.Rev.No. 575 of 2009, whereby the High Court

Recent SC Judgement – R.N. Agarwal Vs. R.C. Bansal – 14.10.14 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Ananda Poojary Vs. State of Karnataka – 14.10.14

[Criminal Appeal No. 2202 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 7185 of 2013] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. By this appeal, the appellant Ananda Poojary questions the legality and validity of the judgment dated 14.02.2013 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, whereby the appellant’s conviction for offences under

Recent SC Judgement – Ananda Poojary Vs. State of Karnataka – 14.10.14 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Goa Foundation Vs. Union of India and in the matter of: M/s. Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. – 14.10.14

[Interlocutory Application No.86 of 2014 in Writ Petition(C) No. 435 of 2012] O R D E R 1. Through the instant interlocutory application, the applicant-M/s Bandekar Brothers Private Limited has prayed for a direction to the concerned authorities for restraining them from auctioning the mined mineral ore produced by the applicant prior to 22.11.2007, through

Recent SC Judgement – Goa Foundation Vs. Union of India and in the matter of: M/s. Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. – 14.10.14 Read More »

Disclaimer

In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.

The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.

Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.