CHANDIGARH: The massive operation to locate and arrest controversial ‘godman’ Rampal cost the exchequer over Rs 26 crore, the Punjab and Haryana high court was on Friday told. Amidst tight security, Rampal was produced before a division bench of justices M Jeyapaul and Darshan Singh here which adjourned the case to December 23 when Rampal […]
Operation to arrest godman Rampal cost over Rs 26 crore Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday turned the heat on BCCI suspended president N Srinivasan and Chennai Super Kings, the IPL franchise owned by Srinivasan’s India Cement, by saying that the team should be disqualified from IPL without any further inquiry and raising doubts about Srinivasan returning as the Board chief. It asked the
SC wants CSK out of IPL, queers Srinivasan’s return pitch Read More »
NEW DELHI: Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM) head Asaduddin Owaisi on Thursday dubbed the Presidential order of 1950 limiting Scheduled Caste status to Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhists as “communal”, and sought that dalit status be opened to other religious minorities, only to see the government turn down the demand. Seizing the opportunity offered by an innocuous legislation
Owaisi seeks SC status for all minorities, govt says no Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Delhi high court on Friday quashed nursery admission guidelines of the city government with respect to general category seats and upheld the Ganguly committee recommendations on nursery admissions. The court said private unaided schools should have administrative autonomy to decide on admissions. “Administrative autonomy of private unaided schools cannot be restrained by
[Civil Appeal No.3415 of 2007] T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. This appeal arises out of an order dated 10th February, 2006 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay whereby OSA No.24 of 2006 filed by the appellant-Corporation has been partly allowed and the order passed by a single bench of
[Civil Appeal No. 8469 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.35762/2009] T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals arise out of a judgment dated 23rd September, 2009 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi in W.P. (C) No. 11911 of 2009 whereby the High Court has invoked its
[Criminal Appeal No.1503 of 2007] M. Y. Eqbal, J. 1. The appellant was put on trial along with co-accused Sarbananda Das for offence under section 302/326/34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short the ‘IPC’). The Additional Sessions Judge, Jorhat by judgment dated 30.03.2006 in Sessions Case No.27 (J.J.) of 2005, acquitted the co-accused Sarbananda
Recent SC Judgement – Tanua Rabidas Vs. State of Assam – 04.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.8463 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.26308 of 2013] M.Y. Eqbal, J.: 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.4.2013 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (in short, “National Commission”) whereby Revision Petition No.4951 of
Recent SC Judgement –Narinder Singh Vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd. – 04.09.14 Read More »
The Centre on Thursday submitted before the Supreme Court that Sanskrit will be the third language in classes 6 to 8 in Kendriya Vidyalayas. Appearing before the bench headed by Chief Justice H L Dattu, Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi sought its permission to file an affidavit on the controversy arising out of Centre’s decision to
Sanskrit to be 3rd language in Classes 6-8 in KVs: Centre tells SC Read More »
The Supreme Court said that ousted BCCI chief N Srinivasan’s conflict of interest was “obvious” as he also owned a team in the IPL that he would want to win in the tournament. The court also questioned BCCI if it was willing to take actions against all the persons after the Mudgal probe panel report
N Srinivasan’s conflict of interest obvious, says Supreme Court Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
