NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday observed that action should be taken on the Mudgal Committee’s probe report on the IPL spot-fixing scam and team Chennai Super Kings should be ‘terminated without further enquiry’ from the IPL tournament. “In the face of so many irregularities, isn’t it easier to disqualify? SC asked, after the […]
Act on Mudgal report and disqualify CSK from IPL, SC observes Read More »
NEW DELHI: Parliament and Supreme Court buildings may be facing serious fire hazard as they have not received a fire safety certificate for the last 10 years. The issue was highlighted by the central information commission (CIC) which pulled up the Delhi Fire Service for not releasing information regarding the fire safety of the Parliament
No fire safety certificates for Parliament, SC in 10 years Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 499 of 2011] Jaysukh Bavanji Shingalia Vs. State of Gujarat and Another [Criminal Appeal No. 2105 of 2013] Malabhai Shalabhai Rabari and Others Vs. State of Gujarat and Others [Criminal Appeal Nos. 2108-2112 of 2013] Kalubhai Dulabhai Khachar Vs. State of Gujarat and Another [Criminal Appeal No.2107 of 2013] Sondabhai Hanubhai Bharwad
Recent SC Judgement –State of NCT of Delhi Vs. Sanjay – 04.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.459 of 1997] R.M. LODHA, CJI. 1. On 12.11.1951, the Uttar Pradesh Official Language Act, 1951 (U.P. Act No.XXVI of 1951) (for short, ‘1951 Act’) was published in Gazette Extraordinary and came into force. 1951 Act was passed in Hindi by the U.P. Legislative Assembly on 27.09.1951 and by the U.P Legislative Council
Recent SC Judgement – U.P. Hindi Sahitya Sammelan Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh – 04.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 8434 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 22487 of 2012] 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 09.01.2012 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in L.P.A. No. 20 of 2012, whereby the High Court dismissed the
[Criminal Appeal No. 2030 of 2012] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. This appeal arises out of the judgment of High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dated 28.11.2011 passed in Crl. Appeal No. 716- DB/2002, in and by which the High Court confirmed the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC and also the
Recent SC Judgement – Prempal Vs. State of Haryana – 03.09.14 Read More »
NEW DELHI: SC has awarded death sentence to a 47-year-old man from Maharashtra after finding him guilty of raping a 4-year-old girl and then stoning her to death. The apex court said the case fell in the rarest of rare category as the child had always referred to the man from neighbourhood as an uncle
SC awards death penalty to man for raping 4-yr-old girl, stoning her to death Read More »
NEW DELHI: Law minister Sadananda Gowda on Tuesday blamed the present collegium system of appointment of judges for existing vacancies in the high courts. Against a sanctioned strength of 984 judges in 24 high courts (HCs), there are only 636 judges at present, with almost 348 posts or nearly 35% vacant. The Allahabad HC has
Law minister blames collegium system for judges vacancy in high courts Read More »
Emphasising upon a need to assure people that the State would take care of the girl child, the Supreme Court on Tuesday urged the state governments to give incentives to every family with a girl child so as to battle the menace of female foeticide and help improving the sex ratio in the country. “We
Supreme Court urges state govts to give incentives to family with girl child Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 8658 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.15194 of 2006] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. Leave granted. This matter has been placed before us in view of the dis-agreement by a Bench of Two Judges with the earlier order of this Court on the question whether the height can be
Recent SC Judgement – Abhay Kumar Singh Vs. State of Bihar – 02.09.14 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
