NEW DELHI: It was an eye-opener for Delhi’s trial court judges as they heard a rape survivor, an acid attack victim, a transgender and an activist working with deaf sexual assault victims recount their experiences of deposing before the court. All of them complained of a hostile court atmosphere which made it difficult for them […]
Judges meet sexual assault victims in rare face-to-face Read More »
Justice Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court has issued a notice to CBI on a plea filed by Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad’s nephew regarding morphing of a photo of Azad and Najma Heptulla in a book published on the country’s first education minister. Azad’s nephew has urged that the morphing was done at the
Delhi High Court seeks CBI status report on Azad-Heptulla morphed photo Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos. 10264-10266 of 2013] H.L. Dattu, J. 1. In view of the difference of opinion by two learned Judges, and by referral order dated 13.11.2013 of this Court; these Civil Appeals are placed before us for our consideration and decision. The question before this bench is whether the workmen engaged in statutory canteens,
Recent SC Judgement – Balwant Rai Saluja & ANR. Vs. Air India Ltd. & Ors. – 25.08.2014 Read More »
[Writ Petition (CRL.) No. 120 of 2012] [Writ Petition [C] No. 463 of 2012] [Writ Petition [C] No. 515 of 2012] [Writ Petition [C] No. 283 of 2013] R.M. LODHA, CJI. 1. Coal is king and paramount Lord of industry is an old saying in the industrial world. Industrial greatness has been built up on
Recent SC Judgement – Manohar Lal Sharma Vs. The Principal Secretary & Ors. – 25.08.2014 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. (S). 6471 of 2014 Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.7039 of 2006] M.Y. EQBAL, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 5.8.2004 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore, in Second Appeal No.165- 166 of 1999, whereby the Second Appeal was allowed, the
Recent SC Judgement – Tolya etc. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Another etc. – 22.08.2014 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 1808 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.9901 of 2011] [Criminal Appeal No. 1807 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.9915 of 2011] (SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 08/09/2011 passed by the
The Delhi High Court on Friday sought the CBI’s reply on a journalist’s plea seeking quashing of a trial court order framing charges against him for allegedly hatching a criminal conspiracy with government officials to obtain ‘secret papers’. Justice Indermeet Kaur issued the notice to CBI and asked them to file a reply by February
HC notice to CBI on journalist’s plea Read More »
NEW DELHI: In a brazen violation of the child protection act, the Institution for the Blind in Amar Colony, Delhi, has seemingly hushed up the alleged sexual assault of two of its Class 3 students by a teacher last year. This is despite a signed confession by the alleged perpetrator and reports of two school
Blind kids raped last Children’s Day, no FIR Read More »
The Supreme Court today upheld the appeal filed by the Central Government against a judgment delivered by the Madras High Court, by which High Court had disallowed caste based census. The judgment authored by Justice Dipak Misra, is from a three judge Bench consisting of Justices Dipak Misra, UULalit and RFNariman. The judgment quotes the
The Supreme Court today demanded details from the Central Government with respect to individuals residing in Government accommodations. It urged the Government to render information regarding the categories of bungalows existing in Delhi, their allotment under discretionary and people who have been overstaying in the same. It was pointed out by the amicus curiae that Congress leader Arjun Singh’s
Give details of individuals staying in Government accommodations: SC to Centre Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
