Law Intellect India

admin

SC orders Haryana police to identify beneficiaries of AIPMT paper leak

The Supreme Court on Thursday directed Haryana Police to identify the beneficiaries of paper leak and other irregularities of the 2015-16 All India Pre-Medical Test (AIPMT). A bench led by Justice A K Sikri said that the court would first try to segregate those who benefitted from the illicit means from the genuine candidates so […]

SC orders Haryana police to identify beneficiaries of AIPMT paper leak Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad Vs. M/s. Detergents India Ltd. – 08.04.15

[Civil Appeal Nos.9049-9051 of 2003] [Civil Appeal Nos.4645-4646 of 2004] [Civil Appeal Nos.6166-6168 of 2004] [Civil Appeal No.7495 of 2004] R.F. Nariman, J. 1. These four sets of appeals relate to the correct construction of Section 4(1)(a) proviso (iii) and Section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excise and Salt Act as they stood prior to the

Recent SC Judgement – Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad Vs. M/s. Detergents India Ltd. – 08.04.15 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Dhannulal Vs. Ganeshram – 08.04.15

[Civil Appeal No.3410 of 2007] Ganeshram Vs. Dhannulal and Others [Civil Appeal No.3411 of 2007] JUDGMENT M. Y. EQBAL, J. 1. Aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the High Court, partly dismissing First Appeal No.92 of 2001, both the plaintiff and the defendant have filed the aforementioned two appeals. While confirming judgment and

Recent SC Judgement – Dhannulal Vs. Ganeshram – 08.04.15 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Major Singh Vs. State of Punjab – 08.04.15

[Criminal Appeal No. 1145/2012] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. This criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 20.8.2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal No.S-1029-SB of 1998 whereby the High Court confirmed the conviction of the appellants under Section 304B IPC and the sentence of imprisonment of seven

Recent SC Judgement – Major Singh Vs. State of Punjab – 08.04.15 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Foreshore Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Praveen D. Desai (D) through LRS. – 08.04.15

[Civil Appeal No. 7732 of 2011] Razia Amirali Shroff and others Vs. M/s Nishuvi Corporation and others [Civil Appeal No. 5514 of 2012] Razia Amirali Shroff and others Vs. M/s Nishuvi Corporation and others [Civil Appeal No. 5515 of 2012] Nusli Neville Wadia Vs. Ferani Hotels (Pvt.) Ltd. and others [Civil Appeal No(s). 3396 of

Recent SC Judgement – Foreshore Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Praveen D. Desai (D) through LRS. – 08.04.15 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – S.J. Coke Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd. – 08.04.15

[Civil Appeal Nos. 3399-3400 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.12925-12926/2013] [Civil Appeal No. 3419 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.13286/2013] [Civil Appeal No. 3401 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.14148/2013] [Civil Appeal No. 3402 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.14430/2013] [Civil Appeal No. 3403 of 2015 arising

Recent SC Judgement – S.J. Coke Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd. – 08.04.15 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – ONGC Petro Additions Ltd. Vs. Daelim Industrial Company Ltd., Korea – 07.04.15

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J. 1. In spite of the fact, that notice in this case was issued to the non-applicant, and the non-applicant-Daelim Industrial Company Limited, Korea, was duly served, yet none entered appearance on behalf of the non- applicant. Even though the matter came to be adjourned on some dates, on account of the

Recent SC Judgement – ONGC Petro Additions Ltd. Vs. Daelim Industrial Company Ltd., Korea – 07.04.15 Read More »

Disclaimer

In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.

The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.

Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.